tinpra: (Default)
(what do you want from my life...I'm waiting out a storm)
The more I use the new lj-cuts for various things, the more I dislike them. Part of the reason people cut things is to save you from long rants, long stories, long lists, and heaps upon heaps of photos. I don't want that just unfurling in my f-list especially if I have to scroll back up to the top of the entry to close the thing. I dunno know about other ppl, but sometimes I skim my f-list to see what I've missed since my last visit, then go back to the top and read whatever caught my eye. If something's really interesting, I'll read it immediately. But now that that means opening up a (potentially) humungous post, I'm less inclined to go back and read the things that didn't grab my must-read-now instinct the first time around. And, as someone pointed out on the [livejournal.com profile] lj_releases, I'm less inclined to go exploring their journal for more interesting things. Yes, I could open the cut in another tab but why should I have to? I usually have 2-3 tabs open anyway. Plus, they're my tabs. Whether there's space for 3 or 50, I shouldn't be forced to open more than I want to. (I realize that no one's "forcing" me to do anything, but seeing that the former way of using lj-cuts is no longer available to me even though that's exactly the way I want to use them, I am being "forced" to use a work-around.)

So. There's my rant. I am now off to cross-post it on lj-releases with the hope that, like those stupid scissors, this is a change that will either go away or actually be improved. Fingers crossed.
tinpra: (Default)
This post below the cut (b/c my post is turning out to be fairly long), apparently, speaks to a bone of contention I've been having with my feminist sisters lately (not all the sisters, but you know what I mean): The feeling that violence and degradation isn't often the baseline position that women find themselves in when society goes to pot. If when, not too long ago, this country and others in the Western world were doing well and still not giving women equal pay and recognition, what do you think happens to women when society goes down the toilet? I'm not saying it's right, because God knows it's not. I'm not saying it should be better, because God knows that it should be. But when it's all sliding downhill, it's often women and children who are pushed down the hill first. Why? Because at our hearts, people as a whole are wicked. I'm not talking disasters on a small scale (one town, one state, one nation) but what we saw with the global meltdown.

You're probably wondering what my trigger for this was. I was reading a glowing review of Looper (which really is good), whose author felt that the movie's only misstep was its misrepresentation of women. Not one woman, it points out, is in a real position of power. We have women in service (waitresses, cooks, doorkeepers, etc.), whores, moms, and other not-so-great traditional roles. But there are no female Loopers, no female bodyguards, no women with any obvious power. And none of them seem to be trying to get power either.

What the author failed to take into consideration, is that (a) the movie takes place in a city that makes Detroit at its worst look like Paris' Golden age, and (b) our main character's a criminal. In other words, society's gone to pot and the people that we're focusing on in that society are at the charred bottom of that pot. In which case it makes sense that all the women our main character interacts with are waitresses, whores and the occasional mom. Actually, the mom's kind of a surprise!

Should society at any state be like this? No, heck no. Is it? Yes. We (you, me, my feminist sisters with whom I am annoyed) need to take that into account and go forward from there. Pretending that it's not doesn't help anyone. You can't cover an issue this big--that women at the low end of society get the worst of it--with disbelief and expect to fix it.

Okay, now I'm rambling/ranting a bit pointlessly.

In counterpoint to all this, because she has a very good point:
[livejournal.com profile] jaguarx13: eh, I'm not sure I agree. The writers could have chosen to make women's roles stronger. We were only seeing one possibility
[livejournal.com profile] jaguarx13: if no one branches out beyond the status quo, things will never change

Please see below. And watch out for those trigger warnings. )

Stuck

Jan. 4th, 2012 09:45 pm
tinpra: (Default)
I want to write...but I got nothin'. But the minute I'm away from a writing utensil, or should be doing some work, then I'll be struck with a flash of brilliance. Ugh! Sigh.
tinpra: (Default)
I don't know who, if anyone else, regularly checks LJ on their smartphone, but have you seen the new mobile site? You'll never guess what they snuck onto the homepage. Why it's ONTD! Um, if I didn't want it on my regular LJ homepage why the heck would I want it on my phone? Now all I have to do is figure out where I can complain.

Grr. Argh.
tinpra: (Default)
So while icon trolling (have I mentioned that I have a "problem" when it comes to icons?) I ran across this one: . I don't know who it's by. I admit that I don't particularly care or think that knowing its maker is relevant.

Correct me if I'm wrong (b/c I know someone will) but evolution, macro-evolution to make things absolutely plain, is a theory. A theory, as described by Meriam-Webster online is, among other things: "5: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena" You can check out the other definitions, but I believe this is the one that fits best. On the other hand, gravity is a scientific law, or fact (if you look up law, I suggest definition 6a.). Now, admittedly, micro-evolution happens every day. Micro-evolution is also a fact, or a law. But just because micro-evolution is true does not necessarily mean that macro-evolution is true. I think that, in any other case, if you were to make a statement like "Because tinpra's uses lj to do quizzes and memes, all other people with the prefix tin- us lj to do quizzes and memes" you'd be laughed out of serious discussion, not unless you had proof. And, yes, I know there is "proof" Trust me, I've never failed a science test when it comes to the subject, and I can fight a pro-evolutionary stance with the best of them.

But then why isn't it a law? What keeps macro-evolution and micro-evolution from being flat-out the Law of Evolution, capital L capital E? Any scientists/science geeks on my flists or just floating by who can answer that for me in a clear, concise (or even rambly, quite honestly) non-ranty way? Ask [livejournal.com profile] lieueitak, I'll give thoughtful, calm discussion to the most hot-button topics, above min-rant notwithstanding, if we can be civilized about it.
tinpra: (Default)
Since when had we given up on the Space bar?

This from the description of a Tin Man fic (my newest obsession, such that if I ever get around to listing what I've been reading these last mths, they'll all be Tin Man) on FF.net: "i'm really not good at these summary things.but,obviously,it's slash,WCxG.don't like,dont read.simple as that."

I'm not great at summaries either (I've been told so) but I know enough to use proper capitalization, grammar, and spaces!!!

tinpra: (Default)
So I ran across this article on MSN last month. If you don't feel like clicking the link, it's about a breakthrough in stem cell research in which "skin cells [were] made to mimic stem cells." As someone who's against embryonic stem cell research, I have no problem with it. According to the article it's still risky and experimental business and isn't up to use in treating disease in humans yet.

What annoyed and bothered me about the article is that there is absolutely no mention of adult stem cell research. It makes it seem like until the discovery they made was found there was no alternative to something with the potential of embryonic stem cell research. As if there were no other kind of stem cell research. It's not like there wasn't room for it. It's an electronic article! It can be as long or short as they want. And why not mention adult stem cells? The research for it has proved not only viable but has actually helped people. So why not do it? Because it's not as "interesting" as embryonic stem cells.

I understand that adult stem cells are harder to obtain than embryonic stem cells, and that it's a more invasive process (b/c it seems to generally come from bone marrow, ouch), but it's still doable. And bone marrow is not the only place you can find stem cells. The whole point is, unless you get an article that is actually dealing with adult stem cells, like this one, the media tends not to mention adult stem cell research at all. They don't tell you whether or what kind of research and research funds are being put into it. All these claims about how right-wingers are so narrow-minded and won't even consider the benefits of embryonic stem cell research, and yet the supposed "liberal" media is only showing you one option as well.

And that's my...gripe.
tinpra: (Default)
I'm sure other ppl who have been following this more closely than I have already griped about this, but this is my first time running across it. So instead of calling the first movie in The Dark is Rising series...The Dark is Rising, it's being called "The Seeker"! *dies* What is wrong with these people? As if there wasn't enough wrong. There have been things that have come up...like making Will an American and older than he is in the books...that I was willing to overlook. I realize that TDR is much older than Harry Potter, but I'm thinking that much of the audience they're trying to push this movie to don't know that. As such I can see them wanting to distance the TDR from HP. BUT PEOPLE THIS IS RIDICULOUS! Why in God's good name did they change the title? Can anyone think of good reason? I can't.

And that's my fannish rant.
tinpra: (Default)
this is from a chat conversations, for which i apologize. i'm personally not a big fan of reading chat transcripts, not even my own. i also apologize for the idiocy of my male friends. hopefully they don't represent the entire male population, just their own misguided, sometimes amoral, selves.

Read more... )

so

Jul. 18th, 2007 10:34 pm
tinpra: (Default)
Today I got outfitted for a Holter Monitor (which I had been calling a halter monitor for days but no one corrected me b/c of the extreme similarity). Anywho for those of you who don't know it's a mobile heart monitor. No I'm not on my deathbed or anything, I'd just been having weird chest pains a few weeks ago and was [completely] freaking out so I went to the doctor about 2 weeks ago. After listening to my nervous rambling she decided that between my lack of heart-related family history and my age it's unlikely my pains were due to heart trouble. She took my pulse which was a little fast (b/c i was freaking out) then decided to do an EKG just in case. Apparently the EKG showed an extra "kick" - apparently something like an extra beat - in my normal rhythm. That combined with my symptoms prompted her to order that I have this device attached to me.

And boy is it attached. There are three trodes on my upper chest, one under each boob and one on my left side. And they all sorta itch.

Of course you know the day I have some electro-whosamawhatsit is the day that it pours and i get soaked down to my socks. My socks I tell you. My socks still weren't dry when I left work (which reminds me i have to rescue them from my bag so they can go in the wash) and neither were my sneakers. They were...damp so I wore them home anyway. Didn't have much choice. I actually have emergency Chinese Grandma slippers (b/c those things are slippers people, not outerwear!) that I wore to the hospital and back - only to find that one of them had come completely loose! So what was the point in that I ask you? Of course my boss is fanatical about everyone being shod at all times. Luckily he didn't notice. Anyway, yeah, sopping wet when I got in the office this morning. I literally stripped off my shoes at the door. I also happen to have a change of clothes - which does not include spare socks cuz apparently I forgot to replace those from the last downpour.

And I could go on forever about how weird and random my day was (working at two desks, the kookie lady trying to sell me office supplies, someone dropping off random house supplies (it's an office)) but really I just wanted to share about the itchy trodes. I keep feeling like I should just be able to pick it up, take it off, scratch and put it on. I think my nurse will have ten fits if I do that. It's supposed to be on for 24 hours. I'll let you know how it goes.

darnit

Jan. 8th, 2007 01:44 pm
tinpra: (Default)
I think our server "rebuild" has squashed my ability to download this prog I need to listen to e-audiobooks from my library.  Grr. Argh.
tinpra: (Default)
So Saturday was mine and my friend's joint b'day party. As usual it felt more like her b'day party, or two b'day parties but...that's neither here nor there. I'm not actually on to rant about that aspect of things. Oh no. I'd like to rant about the fact that I had to go to a party in the middle of Nano! I completely lost Saturday in so many ways. I had a month's worth of laundry to do (okay so that one's my fault) plus some last minute shopping (okay so I got an unexpected pair of cute boots out of that) and then when I was finally ready to leave they wouldn't let me. What happened to the birthday girl getting her way? So while I could have gone to bed around, say, 11:30/midnight I went to bed more like 1/1:30. When I say I have to get up early on Sunday, I mean it people! And then our neighbors upstairs were having a party until 3 - or so Mom told me. At that point I was so tired we could have had a quake and I wouldn't have noticed. And I got up okay but...I had had a long day before and it's been a long sleepless November and there's still Thanksgiving to contend with. Sigh. Can you hear the whine yet?

Anywho, so, no writing done on Saturday despite hopes to the contrary. Aaaaand, I forgot to mention, I got totally distracted by Mom on Friday so I only made half my quota. So here comes Sunday night and not only do I have to do my regular 2k but Saturday's 2k and 1k from Friday. 5000 words people! *faints* Supposedly I'm trying to make up the 2k I lost that time we had work done in the apartment but I'm just so freakin' tired! I'm happy to have made up the words I missed Fri and Sat. But now I'm completely beat.

Does this mean I wish I had been home writing instead of out w/my friends? Not exactly. Do I wish they would have friggin let me go home? You bet your bottom dollar!

Oh, and my back hurts.

Profile

tinpra: (Default)
tinpra

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 20th, 2026 09:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios