It's the Opinion Please? redux
Jan. 22nd, 2010 12:43 pmremember my last post when I asked for help making a sentence work? I got two very good (and surprisingly similar) options for fixing my horrible sentence from
moony_blues and
shaxberd
Below is what I actually ended up with.
“But there still has to be some kind of balance. We kill to survive, yes, but we do it so casually. We can be cruel and petty and capricious. And we can live ever so much longer than you can. So when we die—balance has to be reached. If oblivion were an option, oblivion would be kind."
Basically I dropped the line in question all together and re-ordered the last sentence. Should I go back? It would look something like this:
“But there still has to be some kind of balance. We kill to survive, yes, but we do it so casually. We can be cruel and petty and capricious. And we can live ever so much longer than you can. So when we die—balance has to be reached. For we who have no souls, no life in ourselves, oblivion would be kind - if oblivion were an option."
Below is what I actually ended up with.
“But there still has to be some kind of balance. We kill to survive, yes, but we do it so casually. We can be cruel and petty and capricious. And we can live ever so much longer than you can. So when we die—balance has to be reached. If oblivion were an option, oblivion would be kind."
Basically I dropped the line in question all together and re-ordered the last sentence. Should I go back? It would look something like this:
“But there still has to be some kind of balance. We kill to survive, yes, but we do it so casually. We can be cruel and petty and capricious. And we can live ever so much longer than you can. So when we die—balance has to be reached. For we who have no souls, no life in ourselves, oblivion would be kind - if oblivion were an option."
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 07:46 pm (UTC)Ah, here's what I want: FanFiction Garret: Writing Tutorial #7: Revealing Character. Focus on "the action of speaking" section so I don't have to retype it. Both versions convey the same information; you need to settle on which one is better for the character.
Haven't got through the chapter yet, *raspberry at this week.* It'll be coming with me when I have to pick up my mother at the airport.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 08:59 pm (UTC)Something to ponder and ponder hard. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 06:48 pm (UTC)I actually like the second option you have here more. I like the "for we who have no souls" bit - at least in this excerpt, because it's more revealing. I also like the "oblivion would be kind - if oblivion were an option." I think that ordering gives the entire sentence more weight. I could be alone in that though. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 07:31 pm (UTC)I've done that plenty. I'm in the middle of rectifying that in a particular instance, actually.
I actually like the second option you have here more.
In context, the narrator has already gone on for a few paras about vampires not being animated by souls (the soul has moved on) but rather by some inexplicable parasite. Which is why I felt comfortable dropping the whole sentence. Altho I sent that whole section to moony and in her revision she kept the sentence in (it's her fix that I'm using in the 2nd option), so it looks like there's something there.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 08:04 pm (UTC)The Punctuation Nazi in me, of course, is focused on this part:
So when we die—balance has to be reached.
Now, you have to remember that this is just my opinion on it:
So, when we die, a balance has to be reached.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 08:55 pm (UTC)It's something else to ponder. Thanks, Erin!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 09:03 pm (UTC)