I officially like Syfy's Alice over Burton's, much as I love Tim Burton as a general rule. While it was an enjoyable film, it still...dragged? I think the group consensus was that the story moved quickly, and yet it was a kinda boring story. Visually interesting, but oddly slow. I kept waiting for Something Big and Interesting to happen, and it sorta never really did. Perhaps the film is suffering from its own hype? Overall it is not, by any stretch, a bad film. Was it worth paying full price for (always my barometer of movie-worthiness)...? Eh, I'm not so sure.
If you have the option of seeing it in IMAX 3D, don't bother. (Of course my first ever 3D film was Avatar so I may be a lot biased. IDK.)
Anyone else seen it yet and have thoughts?
If you have the option of seeing it in IMAX 3D, don't bother. (Of course my first ever 3D film was Avatar so I may be a lot biased. IDK.)
Anyone else seen it yet and have thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 09:48 pm (UTC)I did think of you, however, with all of her costume changes :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-08 03:13 am (UTC)I kept waiting for the red card guards to take off their helmets. I guess those were their actual heads. Oh! And I kinda loved the Dor Mouse's pink outfit, in spite of my anti-pink stance.
It was a lot of fun
Date: 2010-03-08 08:51 pm (UTC)I heard about 'Alice', and how the film may be inspired by the show as well as the comic series.
I wasn't disappointed though; not like I was with Willy Wonka. Even considered seeing it again as I saw it with a boisterous hilarious group that at times, made my giggles louder than the screen.
The cheshire cat was particularly wonderful.
But that's just me.
Re: It was a lot of fun
Date: 2010-03-08 09:31 pm (UTC)It seems, though, that we are having a complete reversal with our impressions of Willy Wonka and Alice. :) I was definitely disappointed by this Alice but quite charmed by Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
Re: It was a lot of fun
Date: 2010-03-09 05:20 pm (UTC)I was actually most happy about it being its own sort of entity, different enough from the original story that I wouldnt have any qualms with where Tim Burton went.
Charlie was pretty much a disgrace to the Gene Wilder masterpiece. However, David and I were discussing this last night, and I think we both realized that unless Willy Wonka was a childhood staple for you the way it was for us, it would perhaps make sense for a person to come out with the impression that it wasn't as good.
Re: It was a lot of fun
Date: 2010-03-09 08:48 pm (UTC)One random thing I particularly liked about Charlie..., and wasn't wholly expecting, was how faithful it is to Dahl's book, which I hadn't read until the new movie was coming out. I don't remember now if I knew that they would try to follow the book.
Re: It was a lot of fun
Date: 2010-03-09 08:49 pm (UTC)