![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tinpraBy TRIP GABRIEL
Published: August 1, 2010
At Rhode Island College, a freshman copied and pasted from a Web site’s frequently asked questions page about homelessness — and did not think he needed to credit a source in his assignment because the page did not include author information.
At DePaul University, the tip-off to one student’s copying was the purple shade of several paragraphs he had lifted from the Web; when confronted by a writing tutor his professor had sent him to, he was not defensive — he just wanted to know how to change purple text to black.
And at the University of Maryland, a student reprimanded for copying from Wikipedia in a paper on the Great Depression said he thought its entries — unsigned and collectively written — did not need to be credited since they counted, essentially, as common knowledge.
Professors used to deal with plagiarism by admonishing students to give credit to others and to follow the style guide for citations, and pretty much left it at that.
But these cases — typical ones, according to writing tutors and officials responsible for discipline at the three schools who described the plagiarism — suggest that many students simply do not grasp that using words they did not write is a serious misdeed.
( Read the rest at the NYTimes.com )
I know at least two people on my f-list are teachers, and various ones of us are writers or have other creative interests. I think most of us are beyond college. What do you guys think of this? Beyond being lazy and not wanting to put in the hard work of writing, as is mentioned later in the article, I think a lot of the current college generation's apathy about plagiarism, and cheating in general, comes from having cheated for much of their academic lives. I know cheating was alive and strong when I was in middle and high school, and there were definitely mixed feelings about its immorality then.
Published: August 1, 2010
At Rhode Island College, a freshman copied and pasted from a Web site’s frequently asked questions page about homelessness — and did not think he needed to credit a source in his assignment because the page did not include author information.
At DePaul University, the tip-off to one student’s copying was the purple shade of several paragraphs he had lifted from the Web; when confronted by a writing tutor his professor had sent him to, he was not defensive — he just wanted to know how to change purple text to black.
And at the University of Maryland, a student reprimanded for copying from Wikipedia in a paper on the Great Depression said he thought its entries — unsigned and collectively written — did not need to be credited since they counted, essentially, as common knowledge.
Professors used to deal with plagiarism by admonishing students to give credit to others and to follow the style guide for citations, and pretty much left it at that.
But these cases — typical ones, according to writing tutors and officials responsible for discipline at the three schools who described the plagiarism — suggest that many students simply do not grasp that using words they did not write is a serious misdeed.
( Read the rest at the NYTimes.com )
I know at least two people on my f-list are teachers, and various ones of us are writers or have other creative interests. I think most of us are beyond college. What do you guys think of this? Beyond being lazy and not wanting to put in the hard work of writing, as is mentioned later in the article, I think a lot of the current college generation's apathy about plagiarism, and cheating in general, comes from having cheated for much of their academic lives. I know cheating was alive and strong when I was in middle and high school, and there were definitely mixed feelings about its immorality then.